Airtel: SC to DoT: File affidavit stating Airtel will pay lesser SUC than new companies – Times of India
The country’s apex court — Supreme Court — has asked the government to file an affidavit stating that telecom operator Bharti Airtel will have to pay lesser spectrum usage charges (SUCs) to be paid by telecom operator Bharti Airtel. The court directed Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to file an affidavit stating that Airtel will have to pay lower SUCs in comparison with the new players who were allotted airwaves under the 2016 auction.
According to a report in Economic Times, the bench led by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, while hearing the DoT appeal, told additional solicitor general Vikramjit Banerjee that the the department should file “an affidavit stating on oath” that Bharti Airtel in terms of the sectoral tribunal’s order “would be liable to pay lower/lesser SUCs in comparison with the new players who were allotted spectrum under the 2016 telecom policy/auction”.
DoT claimed to have acted arbitrarily
The report further said that the court asked DoT to give a chart indicating the revenue difference between the 2010 and 2016 auctions. For perspective, the telecom department had challenged the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal’s December 21, 2021 ruling that quashed a clause in its August 2016 office order related to SUCs for different spectrum bands.
Both Bharti Airtel and Bharti Hexacom had moved the tribunal against the 2016 clause alleging that the DoT had acted arbitrarily and unreasonably in excluding the spectrum in 2300 MHz and 2500 MHz bands acquired or allocated prior to 2015-2016 for determining the floor amount of SUC to be paid by the operators.
According to a report in Economic Times, the bench led by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, while hearing the DoT appeal, told additional solicitor general Vikramjit Banerjee that the the department should file “an affidavit stating on oath” that Bharti Airtel in terms of the sectoral tribunal’s order “would be liable to pay lower/lesser SUCs in comparison with the new players who were allotted spectrum under the 2016 telecom policy/auction”.
DoT claimed to have acted arbitrarily
The report further said that the court asked DoT to give a chart indicating the revenue difference between the 2010 and 2016 auctions. For perspective, the telecom department had challenged the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal’s December 21, 2021 ruling that quashed a clause in its August 2016 office order related to SUCs for different spectrum bands.
Both Bharti Airtel and Bharti Hexacom had moved the tribunal against the 2016 clause alleging that the DoT had acted arbitrarily and unreasonably in excluding the spectrum in 2300 MHz and 2500 MHz bands acquired or allocated prior to 2015-2016 for determining the floor amount of SUC to be paid by the operators.
For all the latest Technology News Click Here
For the latest news and updates, follow us on Google News.
Denial of responsibility! NewsUpdate is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
