Google’s newest mid-range smartphone, the Pixel 7a, has made some trade-offs to cut back the price, but it uses the same chip, the Tensor G2, as its other two pricey companions, the Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro. But, now it has come to light that the Tensor G2 on the Pixel 7a might differ from the one powering the Pixel 7 duo.
Notable tipster Kamila Wojciechowska dug inside the kernel logs, finding that the Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 chip is different from the one powering the Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro. The two Tensor G2 chips use different packaging methods.
The Pixel 7a chip uses so-called IPOP packaging versus the standard Tensor G2’s FOPLP-PoP packaging. But, what does it mean? The FOPLP-PoP packaging is a newer method. According to Wojciechowska, IPOP packaging is thicker, larger, and hotter in theory than FOPLP-PoP packaging, as stated on Samsung‘s website.
How does the difference translate into real-world scenarios? There is no absolute word on the impact of the different packaging methods on real-world usage, and the real difference is only known to Samsung and Google.
During our time with the Pixel 7a (review), we did not find any major performance difference between it and the Pixel 7, but there were scenarios when the phone heated a bit, and that could have to do with the thermal limitations compared to the Pixel 7, due to differences in their cooling capabilities. Using the IPOP package could have cost consequences and affect the device’s ability to dissipate heat and overall performance.
While the exact difference might remain a mystery, it is reported that the IPOP might have cost Google a little less than the FOPLP-PoP packaging that it used for the Tensor G2 on Pixel 7. So this could have been done to bring down the costs, keeping the Pixel 7a as affordable as possible.
Notable tipster Kamila Wojciechowska dug inside the kernel logs, finding that the Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 chip is different from the one powering the Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro. The two Tensor G2 chips use different packaging methods.
The Pixel 7a chip uses so-called IPOP packaging versus the standard Tensor G2’s FOPLP-PoP packaging. But, what does it mean? The FOPLP-PoP packaging is a newer method. According to Wojciechowska, IPOP packaging is thicker, larger, and hotter in theory than FOPLP-PoP packaging, as stated on Samsung‘s website.
How does the difference translate into real-world scenarios? There is no absolute word on the impact of the different packaging methods on real-world usage, and the real difference is only known to Samsung and Google.
During our time with the Pixel 7a (review), we did not find any major performance difference between it and the Pixel 7, but there were scenarios when the phone heated a bit, and that could have to do with the thermal limitations compared to the Pixel 7, due to differences in their cooling capabilities. Using the IPOP package could have cost consequences and affect the device’s ability to dissipate heat and overall performance.
While the exact difference might remain a mystery, it is reported that the IPOP might have cost Google a little less than the FOPLP-PoP packaging that it used for the Tensor G2 on Pixel 7. So this could have been done to bring down the costs, keeping the Pixel 7a as affordable as possible.
For all the latest Technology News Click Here
For the latest news and updates, follow us on Google News.
Denial of responsibility! NewsUpdate is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
